Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Standardizing instant messaging protocols

Instant messaging's growth hasn't been as robust as many expected
Unified Communications Alert By Michael Osterman , Network World , 07/15/2008
Michael Osterman
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Industries thrive when there is just one standard to adopt. E-mail has become much more pervasive because of the SMTP protocol; the video industry grew quickly because VHS won out over beta; IBM dominated the PC industry in the 1980s because only 20% or so of its architecture was proprietary; Warner's and Wal-Mart's decision to go exclusively with Blu-Ray effectively killed HD DVD, paving the way for more rapid growth of the high-def video format.

While instant messaging is popular and pervasive in the corporate world, its growth has not been as robust as many expected it to be even just a few years ago. In my opinion, this is due far less to the utility of instant messaging and much more to the fact that there has never been a single, dominant standard that would make competing instant messaging compatible. While there are tools like Trillian for Windows, AdiumX for the Mac, Meebo on the Web and various federated systems that allow users of competing systems to talk with one another, standards-based communications is almost always a more effective solution to growing an industry.

The two major standards in the world of real-time communications are Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) and Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). While there have been debates over the merits of both protocols, one of them emerging as the clear winner would very likely accelerate the instant messaging industry. Among vendors that support XMPP are Google, Jabber and Apple. Vendors supporting SIP include Microsoft, IBM, Avaya, Cisco and Nortel. Lots of other vendors support either or both standards. Yahoo seems to be leaning toward XMPP.

Clearly, eliminating one standard (which I am not advocating) would help to grow the instant messaging and real-time communications industry substantially.

I’d like to get your thoughts on this, both from the standpoint of which standard you hope prevails, as well as on the utility of instant messaging for your organization. Please send me an e-mail with your thoughts.

Partner Content
CA logo

CA Network & Voice Resource Center

Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.

CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center

whitepaper

Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence

Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.

Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence

whitepaper

The Changing Face of Network Management

Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution

Download Whitepaper

Comments (4)
Login
Forgot your account info?

The Barracuda IM Firewall also supports XMPPBy Anonymous on July 22, 2008, 2:05 amWe have the Barracuda IM Firewall which provides an embedded XMPP server in an appliance form factor. The Barracuda IM Firewall is interoperable with Jabber and...

Reply | Read entire comment

It's not how many standards, but how truly open they areBy Anonymous on July 16, 2008, 2:11 pmXMPP and SIP/SIMPLE can be effectively federated, as my employer, Jabber, Inc., and others have proven. It is the use of proprietary undocumented standards (including...

Reply | Read entire comment

Interesting.. one point though..By Anonymous on July 16, 2008, 4:49 amIBM does support XMPP - through the Sametime Gateway.

Reply | Read entire comment

Standard is a bit of a misnomer with SIP/SIMPLEBy Anonymous on July 15, 2008, 1:52 pmBy and large, XMPP based products interoperate with other the way one would expect. We use a commercial XMPP based system in our environment and end users will...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Get instant email notification when white papers, webcasts, executive guides are added to our library. Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest on IT Technologies with Network World's Resource Alerts.