maybe they should look at software based nac solutions that are actually successful.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
software based Nac
or maybe not everyone wants to add another client to the corporate desktop to ensure the AV and OSes are current, considering they should be able to determine some of this through existing resources.
Another point is that NAC does not mean the same to all. You should go into a NAC with a list of requirements for what you specifically want to accomplish. Guest access, light vulnerability scan, deep vulnerability scan, end-user access.
Overall positive
I think overall the Infonetics report is very positive, despite the negative headline highlighted here. I blogged on it at http://www.napera.com/blog/?p=41
Todd
Post new comment