|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Happy To See NAT
I for one am happy to see NAT coming to IPv6. Lack of NAT is a big drawback to IPv6 for many people. A majority of users have internet connections with only one IP address net run multiple pieces of equipment. This is all thanks to a NAT router.
Now what do you do if your ISP is stingy with the IPv6 addresses and refuses to give you more than one? Do you junk your other equipment. Or, what if your ISP will let you have additional addresses BUT at an extra cost per IP address per month? At least with NAT, I can take charge of my own computing environment and I do not need permission of my ISP to run several computers and other IP based devices in my home.