|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
The latency is not very high on GigabiteEthernet interface
Per RFC 2544, latency is measured at, and only at, the throughput rate, which in this case was line rate.
RFC 4689 introduces a related metric, forwarding delay, that can be measured at any intended load, not just the throughput rate. Whenever I refer to latency, it's always at the throughput rate; for any other load I refer to the measurement as delay or forwarding delay.
I do not agree that these measurements are high; in fact they're either in line with or lower than similar devices I've tested. See, for example, the seven-switch comparison Network World published in March.
Finally, I go by David, not Dave, and normally don't like responding to anonymous posts. Question for you, "anonymous": Who are you?
Regards,
David Newman